Comparison · 8 min read · May 11, 2026
ShotSelect vs Imagen AI.
Imagen AI is one of the cloud-AI category leaders — it learns your editing style and culls or edits a shoot for you on its servers. ShotSelect is a free, on-device, keyboard-first cull app for photographers who'd rather make the keep/reject decision themselves and keep their photos on their own Mac. Here's the honest comparison — including where Imagen still wins.
Download for macOS Free · macOS · 92 MB · v1.1.0
ShotSelect
Free for personal and commercial use. No trial, no upgrade nags.
Imagen AI
Tiered per-image pricing for AI culling and editing; subscription bundles available. Cull tier sits around 5¢/image at typical volumes.
If you want zero-touch AI culling and an AI editor that mimics your style, and you trust the cloud with your client work, Imagen wins — it's purpose-built for that. If you want manual control over every keep/reject, on-device processing, and a free price tag, ShotSelect wins. The two tools answer different questions, and you can use both.
Price
Over a 3,000-frame wedding, Imagen's cull tier typically lands somewhere around $150 at standard rates — give or take, depending on plan and volume bundle. Across a 30-wedding year, that's about $4,500. ShotSelect is $0 regardless of volume. The savings cover a body upgrade — or, if you also use Imagen's AI editor for the edit pass, the savings cover the lens.
Two different products
These tools are doing different things — worth saying clearly:
- Imagen AI automates the cull and, on its higher tiers, automates the edit. You upload your shoot, the AI scores every frame and applies your trained editing style, then you review the results. Hands-off-ish workflow. The model and your photos live on Imagen's servers during processing.
- ShotSelect accelerates manual culling. You drive every keep/reject decision at full keyboard speed (arrow keys, ↑↓ pick/reject), with on-device AI as a search and assist layer. The model lives on your Mac. ShotSelect doesn't edit — it hands off to Lightroom or Capture One via XMP.
Both can take a 3,000-frame wedding to a 400-photo gallery. The difference is who's making the keep/reject decision — Imagen's model, or you.
Privacy: where do your photos live?
The Imagen tradeoff most photographers don't think about
To use Imagen's AI cull or AI edit, you upload your shoot to Imagen infrastructure. The model runs on their GPUs. Your couple's wedding photos, your client's product launch frames, your portrait subject's RAWs — they're processed in Imagen's cloud. Imagen has strong privacy commitments and is well-regarded on this front, but the photos do leave your Mac. Read their current terms; they evolve.
On the free tier, ShotSelect is 100% local. The on-device CLIP model runs on your Mac's Neural Engine. There is no upload step, no cloud account, and no telemetry on photo content. The app works offline.
Feature-by-feature
| Feature | ShotSelect | Imagen AI |
|---|---|---|
| Keyboard-first culling | Yes — full | Limited |
| AI-driven cull (auto) | No — manual + assist | Yes |
| AI editing in your style | No — hand-off to LR/C1 | Yes — flagship feature |
| Blur / closed-eye detection | Yes (assist) | Yes (auto) |
| Duplicate / burst grouping | Yes | Yes |
| Natural-language AI search | Yes (CLIP) | No |
| Star ratings 0–5 | Yes | Yes |
| Color labels | 5 colors | Yes |
| XMP sidecar export | Auto | Auto |
| Lightroom round-trip | Yes | Yes |
| Capture One round-trip | Yes | Yes |
| Photos uploaded to cloud | No — on-device | Yes — required |
| Works fully offline | Yes | No |
| Apple Silicon native | Yes | Yes |
| Windows support | In development | Win + Mac |
| Trained on your edit style | N/A — no editing | Yes — its sweet spot |
| Subscription | None | Required for bundles |
Culling speed
Both apps target a 90-minute wall-clock on a 3,000-frame wedding, by different routes.
Imagen: upload + cloud processing runs while you do something else, typically 30–90 minutes on a fast connection. Then a 15–30 minute review of the AI's picks. You're only actively at the keyboard for a fraction of the wall-clock. Wins for hands-off throughput.
ShotSelect: 90 minutes of focused active culling, end to end. No upload, no waiting on a remote model. You drive every decision and end the session knowing exactly what you have.
For a studio shooting 30+ weddings a year where editorial decision-making matters less per frame than throughput, Imagen wins. For a photographer who wants to look at every keeper themselves, ShotSelect is faster — and free.
Workflow comparison
Wedding photographer (3,000-frame shoot)
Imagen: launch desktop client → sync folder to cloud (15–60 min on home internet) → wait for AI cull → review picks → optionally trigger AI edit in your trained style → export XMP / DNG / processed JPEG → open in Lightroom.
ShotSelect: launch app → drag folder → start arrow-keying through frames at 1–2 sec each → tag, color, star inline → ⌘E to write XMP → open in Lightroom for the edit. See the 90-minute wedding cull guide.
Commercial / brand shoot under NDA
ShotSelect wins. NDA-protected client work, embargoed launch frames, and confidential editorial campaigns are all easier when nothing leaves your Mac. The free tier never uploads photo content.
High-volume studio with a trained edit style and a 24h delivery SLA
Imagen wins. Its AI editor — trained on a thousand of your previous edits — is its flagship and there's no on-device equivalent. If your delivery model depends on the AI editing your style at scale, that's what Imagen is built for.
When to pick which
Pick ShotSelect if…
- You want your photos to stay on your Mac.
- You want manual control over keep/reject — no model second-guessing.
- You'd rather hand off the edit to Lightroom or Capture One yourself.
- You don't want a per-image bill or another subscription.
- You work somewhere with limited or unreliable internet.
Pick Imagen AI if…
- You want an AI editor trained on your style, not just a cull.
- You're OK uploading client work to a third-party cloud.
- You shoot enough volume that hands-off cull + edit pays for itself.
- You're optimising for hands-off wall-clock over editorial control.
- You're already deep into Imagen's profile-training workflow.
Using both
It's a real option. Many photographers use ShotSelect for the initial cull pass — keyboard-fast, on-device, free — and then send only the Selects folder to Imagen for the AI edit. You upload a tenth of the frames, keep the cull pass local, and still get Imagen's edit at the end. The XMP sidecars from ShotSelect carry through cleanly.
Migrating from Imagen
Imagen writes standard XMP sidecars (and optionally edited DNGs). So does ShotSelect. If you've been using Imagen and want to try a fully on-device cull:
- Download ShotSelect (free).
- Open the same RAW folder. ShotSelect reads any existing XMP ratings, so previously-culled shoots show up with stars and picks already applied.
- Try the cull pass on your next shoot. If you miss the AI editor, route the Selects folder back through Imagen for the edit step — your in-Lightroom history is unchanged either way.
No lock-in either way — that's the point of XMP.
Try ShotSelect on your next shoot
Same XMP, free, on-device. Keep both, switch later — no lock-in either way.
More comparisons